G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Tesla M40

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)

2019

Tesla M40

2015

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M40: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M40 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla M40 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 10,128 vs 10,220 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla M40 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015 and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Tesla M40 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $2,500 MSRP. Tesla M40 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Tesla M40 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $2,500 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is the newer 2019 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (80W vs 250W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) make more sense than Tesla M40?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (80W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla M40. The trade-off is that Tesla M40 currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) Benchmark Check

Tesla M40 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
1080p
low	124 FPS	151 FPS
medium	110 FPS	130 FPS
high	96 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	111 FPS	121 FPS
medium	93 FPS	103 FPS
high	78 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	47 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	42 FPS
medium	54 FPS	38 FPS
high	36 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)Open Tesla M40

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
1080p
low	262 FPS	248 FPS
medium	225 FPS	214 FPS
high	168 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	128 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	173 FPS
medium	154 FPS	142 FPS
high	122 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	105 FPS	96 FPS
medium	88 FPS	78 FPS
high	71 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)Open Tesla M40

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
1080p
low	456 FPS	460 FPS
medium	365 FPS	368 FPS
high	304 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	230 FPS
1440p
low	342 FPS	345 FPS
medium	273 FPS	276 FPS
high	228 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	228 FPS	230 FPS
medium	182 FPS	184 FPS
high	144 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	115 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)Open Tesla M40

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
1080p
low	399 FPS	293 FPS
medium	334 FPS	252 FPS
high	267 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	328 FPS	217 FPS
medium	271 FPS	192 FPS
high	206 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	165 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	120 FPS
medium	121 FPS	96 FPS
high	107 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	61 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)Open Tesla M40

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and Tesla M40

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

Tesla M40

The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1112 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
G3D Mark Score	10,128	10,220
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	3072+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.884 TFLOPS	6.832 TFLOPS+40%
Boost Clock	1590 MHz+43%	1112 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	96	192+100%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB+36%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
DirectX	12.1	12.0
Vulkan	1.1	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
Encoder	NVENC 6.0	NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 103% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)	Tesla M40
TDP	80W-68%	250W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	126.6+210%	40.9