
Radeon Pro SSG
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌249.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,999 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,999 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 239.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌249.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro SSG better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 395 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro SSG and Tesla M40 24GB

Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro SSG scores 10,972 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro SSG is built on GCN 3.0 while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,972+3% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+33% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+26% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1112 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+33% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.1 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro SSG draws 260W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 3.9% difference. The Tesla M40 24GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 250W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 42.2 | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The Tesla M40 24GB costs 71.4% less ($4999 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB offers 231.2% better value. The Radeon Pro SSG is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6999 | $2000-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6 | 5.3+231% |
| Codename | Fiji | GM200 |
| Release | July 26 2016 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #249 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












