
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +109.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +109.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen Z2 Go?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen Z2 Go

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 17% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 102.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+250% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+200% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+209% | 12,188 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,802 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,073 |
Memory & Platform
Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 16 (Ryzen Z2 Go) — the Core i5-13600K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and Rembrandt-R (Ryzen Z2 Go).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen Z2 Go) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | SVM |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












