
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z1
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z1.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,406 vs 19,532).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z1.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,406 vs 19,532).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen Z1?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 370 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Z1

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1
The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Z1 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Z1's 18,406 — a 5.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532+6% | 18,406 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z1 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen Z1). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












