Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen Z1

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Z1

6 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 226V

2024

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen Z1 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (18,400 vs 18,406).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen Z1

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Z1 better than Core Ultra 5 226V?
Yes. Ryzen Z1 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 15.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Z1 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 15.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Z1 is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Z1 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Ryzen Z1 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 226V only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 15.7% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 226V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
1080p
low180 FPS262 FPS
medium145 FPS234 FPS
high117 FPS195 FPS
ultra97 FPS167 FPS
1440p
low148 FPS231 FPS
medium117 FPS187 FPS
high95 FPS152 FPS
ultra79 FPS134 FPS
4K
low83 FPS162 FPS
medium71 FPS133 FPS
high57 FPS102 FPS
ultra44 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
1080p
low212 FPS429 FPS
medium176 FPS339 FPS
high158 FPS291 FPS
ultra139 FPS250 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS356 FPS
medium154 FPS295 FPS
high142 FPS261 FPS
ultra122 FPS219 FPS
4K
low137 FPS268 FPS
medium122 FPS227 FPS
high115 FPS206 FPS
ultra100 FPS171 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
1080p
low460 FPS460 FPS
medium460 FPS460 FPS
high460 FPS460 FPS
ultra460 FPS460 FPS
1440p
low460 FPS460 FPS
medium460 FPS460 FPS
high460 FPS460 FPS
ultra424 FPS441 FPS
4K
low460 FPS460 FPS
medium384 FPS437 FPS
high343 FPS372 FPS
ultra272 FPS306 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
1080p
low460 FPS460 FPS
medium460 FPS460 FPS
high460 FPS460 FPS
ultra460 FPS460 FPS
1440p
low460 FPS460 FPS
medium460 FPS460 FPS
high460 FPS460 FPS
ultra460 FPS460 FPS
4K
low460 FPS460 FPS
medium460 FPS460 FPS
high460 FPS434 FPS
ultra408 FPS370 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen Z1

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen Z1

The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 226V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Ryzen Z1's 18,406 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen Z1. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 226V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+150%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark
18,400
18,406
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,041
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z1 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Ryzen Z1). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen Z1 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen Z1
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d