
Core Ultra 5 226V
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z1
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen Z1 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,400 vs 18,406).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024Ryzen Z1
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen Z1 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,400 vs 18,406).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z1 better than Core Ultra 5 226V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 370 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen Z1

Core Ultra 5 226V
Core Ultra 5 226V
The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Z1
Ryzen Z1
The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 226V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Ryzen Z1's 18,406 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen Z1. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 226V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+150% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 18,400 | 18,406 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,041 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,898 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z1 uses FP8 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Ryzen Z1). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen Z1 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 226V | Ryzen Z1 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc 130V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












