
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,668).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
2025Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,668).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z1 Extreme better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 554 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 and Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,668 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Z1 Extreme has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 24,613 against the Ryzen Z1 Extreme's 24,668 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,613 | 24,668 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












