PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,715 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 924.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.5 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 145W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,711).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 61.5 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
❌163.6% higher power demand at 145W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

2025

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,715 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 924.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.5 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 145W, a 90W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+243.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,613 vs 24,711).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 61.5 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
❌163.6% higher power demand at 145W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v4 is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 243.8% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is $3,715 cheaper on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $4,115 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E5-2699 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 924.7% better value on MSRP (61.5 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2699 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	272 FPS	187 FPS
medium	239 FPS	164 FPS
high	204 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	233 FPS	154 FPS
medium	184 FPS	130 FPS
high	153 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	161 FPS	70 FPS
medium	129 FPS	62 FPS
high	99 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	402 FPS	211 FPS
medium	327 FPS	192 FPS
high	282 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	341 FPS	182 FPS
medium	287 FPS	165 FPS
high	255 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	115 FPS
medium	221 FPS	105 FPS
high	201 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	615 FPS	618 FPS
medium	615 FPS	618 FPS
high	615 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	554 FPS	618 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	618 FPS
medium	588 FPS	618 FPS
high	507 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	429 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	509 FPS	469 FPS
medium	416 FPS	382 FPS
high	356 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	289 FPS

Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	615 FPS	618 FPS
medium	615 FPS	618 FPS
high	615 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	615 FPS	614 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	618 FPS
medium	615 FPS	618 FPS
high	615 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	589 FPS	484 FPS
4K
low	602 FPS	550 FPS
medium	536 FPS	493 FPS
high	480 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	373 FPS

Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 and Xeon E5-2699 v4

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,613 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 24,613 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	22 / 44+267%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+36%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	55 MB+244%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+450%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Strix Halo (2025)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,613	24,711

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Socket	FP11	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen AI Max PRO 380) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4). Direct competitor: Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max PRO 380	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Integrated GPU	—	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 debuted at $4115. On MSRP ($400 vs $4115), the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is $3715 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 delivers 61.5 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — making the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 the 164.4% better value option.