
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z1 Extreme.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,668).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Z1 Extreme.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Z1 Extreme across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 24,668).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 Extreme mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Z1 Extreme better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 208 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Z1 Extreme

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Ryzen Z1 Extreme
The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,668 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Z1 Extreme has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Z1 Extreme's 24,668 — a 23.2% lead for the Ryzen Z1 Extreme. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 24,668+26% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Z1 Extreme uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen Z1 Extreme). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen Z1 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











