
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (27,712 vs 67,561).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Delivers 155.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Delivers 155.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 27 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (27,712 vs 67,561).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 786 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 230 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β a 13.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 β a 83.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 67,561+144% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 3,016 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 23,596 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($449 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX β making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 87.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $429-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7 | 157.5+155% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












