
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2275
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $663 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 27,974).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2275
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon W-2275
2019Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $663 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 145.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 165W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 27,974).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2275, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 165W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2275 better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 388 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 640 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon W-2275


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon W-2275
Xeon W-2275
The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2275 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-2275. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+66% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | — |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 27,974 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 19,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,596 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2275 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 4 (Xeon W-2275). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 48 (Xeon W-2275) — the Xeon W-2275 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and C422 (Xeon W-2275).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop, Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Professional Content Creation / VFX |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2275 debuted at $1112. On MSRP ($449 vs $1112), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $663 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 84.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-2275 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-60% | $1112 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+145% | 25.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












