EPYC 7742 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 7742

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

16 Cores32 Thrd350 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7742

2019

Why buy it

  • +2.8% higher PassMark.
  • +300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Draws 225W instead of 350W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 157.5 PassMark/$ ($6,950 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +67.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $6,521 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1476.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 157.5 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $6,950 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (67,561 vs 69,448).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 256 MB).
  • 55.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX better than EPYC 7742?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is ahead with a 67.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7742 pulls ahead with 2.8% better PassMark. EPYC 7742 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7742 is the better fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 64 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $6,521 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $6,950 MSRP, and it gives you a 67.2% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7742 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.8% better PassMark. It is also 1476.0% better value on MSRP (157.5 vs 10.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low192 FPS297 FPS
medium172 FPS270 FPS
high138 FPS223 FPS
ultra110 FPS188 FPS
1440p
low157 FPS273 FPS
medium132 FPS224 FPS
high101 FPS174 FPS
ultra82 FPS153 FPS
4K
low72 FPS187 FPS
medium65 FPS154 FPS
high50 FPS118 FPS
ultra40 FPS104 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low247 FPS786 FPS
medium221 FPS643 FPS
high183 FPS477 FPS
ultra148 FPS403 FPS
1440p
low202 FPS647 FPS
medium186 FPS549 FPS
high158 FPS422 FPS
ultra124 FPS328 FPS
4K
low126 FPS363 FPS
medium118 FPS312 FPS
high103 FPS273 FPS
ultra84 FPS230 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low629 FPS888 FPS
medium536 FPS705 FPS
high486 FPS622 FPS
ultra415 FPS534 FPS
1440p
low524 FPS713 FPS
medium446 FPS567 FPS
high394 FPS489 FPS
ultra338 FPS414 FPS
4K
low389 FPS507 FPS
medium312 FPS418 FPS
high274 FPS375 FPS
ultra224 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
1080p
low906 FPS1106 FPS
medium828 FPS991 FPS
high713 FPS867 FPS
ultra618 FPS781 FPS
1440p
low711 FPS860 FPS
medium623 FPS759 FPS
high534 FPS664 FPS
ultra454 FPS576 FPS
4K
low503 FPS632 FPS
medium454 FPS562 FPS
high401 FPS496 FPS
ultra346 FPS429 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7742 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

AMD

EPYC 7742

The EPYC 7742 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 69,448 points. Launch price was $6,950.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 67,561 points. Launch price was $1,649.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7742 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7742 has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7742 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX (base: 2.25 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 7742 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7742 scores 69,448 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX's 67,561 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 7742. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7742 vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX.

FeatureEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Cores / Threads
64 / 128+300%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
5.4 GHz+59%
Base Clock
2.25 GHz
4.5 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+300%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark
69,448+3%
67,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
40,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,016
Geekbench 6 Multi
23,596
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7742 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7742 versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — the EPYC 7742 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7742 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7742) and WRX90 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX).

FeatureEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Socket
TR4
sTR5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096
2048 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7742) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX). Direct competitor: EPYC 7742 rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX rivals Xeon w7-3555.

FeatureEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7742 launched at $6950 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX debuted at $429. On MSRP ($6950 vs $429), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is $6521 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7742 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 157.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX the 176.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7742Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP
$6950
$429-94%
Performance per Dollar
10.0
157.5+1475%
Release Date
2019
2025