
EPYC 9745
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9745
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (130,698 vs 143,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,142 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9745
2024Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,142 less on MSRP ($9,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (130,698 vs 143,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than EPYC 9745?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 780 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 358 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 260 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 795 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| medium | 884 FPS | 997 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 874 FPS |
| ultra | 658 FPS | 771 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 750 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 656 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 481 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9745 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745
The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9745 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9745 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9745 scores 130,698 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9745 vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+33% | 96 / 192 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 130,698 | 143,017+9% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 148,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 81,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9745 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9745) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9745) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9745) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | Workstation / Scientific Computing |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9745 launched at $12141 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($12141 vs $9999), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is $2142 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9745 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX the 28.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $12141 | $9999-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 14.3+32% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












