PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 365.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 350W, a 225W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 95,891).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 350W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 365.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 350W, a 225W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 95,891).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 350W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX better than Core i5-13600K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 24 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the better fit. You are getting 154.7% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13600K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is 1085.1% more expensive on MSRP at $3,899 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-13600K is also 365.4% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 24 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 14/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	281 FPS	314 FPS
medium	264 FPS	289 FPS
high	220 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	278 FPS
medium	198 FPS	231 FPS
high	158 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	191 FPS
medium	133 FPS	158 FPS
high	102 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	107 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	632 FPS	807 FPS
medium	533 FPS	688 FPS
high	450 FPS	535 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	467 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	666 FPS
medium	474 FPS	591 FPS
high	403 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	384 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	372 FPS
medium	282 FPS	335 FPS
high	269 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	268 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	663 FPS	891 FPS
medium	543 FPS	723 FPS
high	477 FPS	649 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	552 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	714 FPS
medium	499 FPS	580 FPS
high	434 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	508 FPS
medium	381 FPS	419 FPS
high	344 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	311 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
1080p
low	941 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	941 FPS	1002 FPS
high	923 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	872 FPS
medium	850 FPS	768 FPS
high	738 FPS	674 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	587 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	636 FPS
medium	588 FPS	568 FPS
high	529 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX's 95,891 — a 87.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	32 / 64+129%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.3 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	24 MB	128 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Storm Peak (2023)
PassMark	37,655	95,891+155%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	48,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,669
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	22,298

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Socket	LGA1700	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Desktop	Professional Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX debuted at $3899. On MSRP ($329 vs $3899), the Core i5-13600K is $3570 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX — making the Core i5-13600K the 129.3% better value option.