
EPYC 9454P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9454P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,576 vs 20,000).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 290W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
EPYC 9454P
2022Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,901 less on MSRP ($4,598 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.6 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($4,598 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 290W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,576 vs 20,000).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $4,598 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while EPYC 9454P moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX better than EPYC 9454P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 920 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 1160 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 894 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 790 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 631 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

EPYC 9454P
EPYC 9454P
The EPYC 9454P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 94,686 points. Launch price was $4,598.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (base: 2.75 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 9454P uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454P scores 94,686 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,923 vs 1,500, a 24.7% lead for the EPYC 9454P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,576 vs 20,000 (7.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454P vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 64 / 128+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz+2% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 94,686 | 94,737 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 66,403 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,923+28% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,576 | 20,000+8% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9454P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — the EPYC 9454P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454P) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454P) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9454P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454P rivals Xeon 8468; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9454P launched at $4598 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. On MSRP ($4598 vs $6499), the EPYC 9454P is $1901 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454P delivers 20.6 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX — making the EPYC 9454P the 34.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454P | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4598-29% | $6499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6+41% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












