
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,154 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 232.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (42,986 vs 44,510).
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,154 less on MSRP ($1,337 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 232.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.6 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (42,986 vs 44,510).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3970X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 806 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 528 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 652 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 927 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 862 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 765 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 776 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1325 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 917 FPS |
| high | 1073 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 664 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1031 FPS | 802 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX


Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). Both are built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture using a 7 nm, 12 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 44,510 vs 42,986 (3.5% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,664 vs 1,260, a 27.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,739 vs 25,211 (58.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Both processors carry 128 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 62,946+1% | 62,261 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,510+4% | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,664+32% | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,739 | 25,211+83% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 2048 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X launched at $4491 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX debuted at $1337. On MSRP ($4491 vs $1337), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is $3154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX the 107.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491 | $1337-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 46.6+233% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












