
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $888 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 62,261).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+124.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $888 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 46.6 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,337 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 280W, a 175W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+124.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 62,261).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.6 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,337 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 917 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 664 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 802 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-07-14. It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,261 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX's 62,261 — a 76.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+12% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 62,261+125% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 42,986 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,211 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and AMD WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX rivals Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX debuted at $1337. On MSRP ($449 vs $1337), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $888 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 28% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-66% | $1337 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+32% | 46.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












