
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6960P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,626 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (28,666 vs 60,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 432 MB).
Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+109.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,626 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+109.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+68.8% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (28,666 vs 60,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 432 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9980X better than Xeon 6960P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 303 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 803 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 687 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 728 FPS | 874 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 826 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 734 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1131 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 1014 FPS | 891 FPS |
| high | 889 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 802 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 890 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 783 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 688 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 599 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 9980X and Xeon 6960P


Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 142,069 points. Launch price was $4,999.

Xeon 6960P
Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X uses the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X scores 142,069 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 8.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,220 vs 2,100, a 42.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 28,666 vs 60,000 (70.7% advantage for the Xeon 6960P). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 72 / 144+13% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+38% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+19% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 432 MB (total)+69% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm | Intel 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Shimada Peak (2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 142,069+9% | 130,659 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 115,098 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,220+53% | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 28,666 | 60,000+109% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 199.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X) vs 12 (Xeon 6960P). PCIe lanes: 80 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the Xeon 6960P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: sTR5,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA7529 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1 TB | 3072 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 12+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 96+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9980X targets HEDT / Enthusiast Workstation, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9980X rivals Xeon w9-3495X; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | HEDT / Enthusiast Workstation | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X launched at $4999 MSRP, while the Xeon 6960P debuted at $9625. On MSRP ($4999 vs $9625), the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is $4626 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X delivers 28.4 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X the 70.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4999-48% | $9625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4+109% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











