
EPYC 9555P
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,984 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (28,666 vs 29,406).
EPYC 9555P
2024Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,984 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.4 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $7,983 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 28.4 PassMark/$ ($7,983 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (28,666 vs 29,406).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9980X better than EPYC 9555P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 105 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 803 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 269 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 889 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 1014 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 688 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

EPYC 9555P
EPYC 9555P
The EPYC 9555P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,441 points. Launch price was $7,983.


Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 142,069 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9555P and Ryzen Threadripper 9980X share an identical 64-core/128-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9555P uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555P scores 135,441 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X's 142,069 — a 4.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,815 vs 3,220, a 13.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 29,406 vs 28,666 (2.5% advantage for the EPYC 9555P). Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 135,441 | 142,069+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 115,098 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,815 | 3,220+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,406+3% | 28,666 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9555P uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9555P supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 1 TB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9555P) vs 80 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X) — the EPYC 9555P offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555P) and sTR5,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X).
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555P) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9980X). Primary use case: EPYC 9555P targets Data Center / Single Socket, Ryzen Threadripper 9980X targets HEDT / Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555P rivals Xeon 6979P; Ryzen Threadripper 9980X rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Data Center / Single Socket | HEDT / Enthusiast Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555P launched at $7983 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X debuted at $4999. On MSRP ($7983 vs $4999), the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X is $2984 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555P delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 28.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X the 50.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555P | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7983 | $4999-37% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 28.4+67% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












