
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 92,808).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 9960X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 92,808).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 9960X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.9 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9960X better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 272 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X's 92,808 — a 123.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.3 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 92,808+325% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 41,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | Content Creation / Rendering |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X debuted at $1499. On MSRP ($299 vs $1499), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $1200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 61.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 16.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-80% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+18% | 61.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












