
EPYC 9745
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9745
2024Why buy it
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (130,698 vs 135,949).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,142 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
EPYC 9745
2024Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
2023Why buy it
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $7,142 less on MSRP ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.2 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $12,141 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 400W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 7980X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (130,698 vs 135,949).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 27.2 PassMark/$ ($12,141 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 7980X better than EPYC 9745?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 358 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 889 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 884 FPS | 1014 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 658 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 750 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 656 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 688 FPS |
| ultra | 482 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 481 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9745 and Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

EPYC 9745
EPYC 9745
The EPYC 9745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 130,698 points. Launch price was $12,141.


Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,949 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9745 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9745 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9745 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9745 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9745 scores 130,698 against the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X's 135,949 — a 3.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 128 / 256+100% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 130,698 | 135,949+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 98,427 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,050 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9745 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 7980X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 197.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9745) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9745) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X) — the EPYC 9745 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9745) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X).
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+500% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9745) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 7980X). Primary use case: EPYC 9745 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen Threadripper 7980X targets High-end Desktop / Content Creation. Direct competitor: EPYC 9745 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper 7980X rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | High-end Desktop / Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9745 launched at $12141 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X debuted at $4999. On MSRP ($12141 vs $4999), the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X is $7142 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9745 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 27.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 7980X the 86.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9745 | Ryzen Threadripper 7980X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $12141 | $4999-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 27.2+152% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












