
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 230.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,077).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 1950
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 230.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 22,077).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 295 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+44% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 22,077+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,780 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 debuted at $999. On MSRP ($299 vs $999), the Ryzen 5 5600X is $700 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5600X delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 107.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-70% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1+231% | 22.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












