PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 417.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,077 vs 37,655).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13600K

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.4% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 417.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,077 vs 37,655).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13600K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13600K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.4% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13600K is the better fit. You are getting 70.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13600K is the smarter buy today. Core i5-13600K is $670 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it gives you a 24.4% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 417.9% better value on MSRP (114.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13600K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-13600K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	281 FPS	173 FPS
medium	264 FPS	153 FPS
high	220 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	188 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	139 FPS
medium	198 FPS	117 FPS
high	158 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	65 FPS
medium	133 FPS	59 FPS
high	102 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	632 FPS	336 FPS
medium	533 FPS	304 FPS
high	450 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	540 FPS	287 FPS
medium	474 FPS	264 FPS
high	403 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	351 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	316 FPS	184 FPS
medium	282 FPS	169 FPS
high	269 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	115 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	663 FPS	552 FPS
medium	543 FPS	505 FPS
high	477 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	414 FPS	407 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	531 FPS
medium	499 FPS	439 FPS
high	434 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	401 FPS
medium	381 FPS	318 FPS
high	344 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	295 FPS	234 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	941 FPS	552 FPS
medium	941 FPS	552 FPS
high	923 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	831 FPS	487 FPS
1440p
low	941 FPS	552 FPS
medium	850 FPS	535 FPS
high	738 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	651 FPS	416 FPS
medium	588 FPS	382 FPS
high	529 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	295 FPS

Open Core i5-13600K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Core i5-13600K

The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 52.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+59%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	37,655+71%	22,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,780
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13600K) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950).

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.

Feature	Core i5-13600K	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 debuted at $999. On MSRP ($329 vs $999), the Core i5-13600K is $670 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — making the Core i5-13600K the 135.3% better value option.