Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Xeon Gold 6132

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,244).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6132 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6132

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Xeon Gold 6132

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,244).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6132 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6132 better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is ahead with a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6132 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 also has the bigger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6132 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6132 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Gold 6132 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6132 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 12/24 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6132 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Gold 6132
1080p
low	175 FPS	181 FPS
medium	156 FPS	146 FPS
high	129 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	144 FPS
medium	121 FPS	114 FPS
high	97 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	67 FPS
medium	59 FPS	56 FPS
high	46 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Open Xeon Gold 6132

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Gold 6132
1080p
low	398 FPS	400 FPS
medium	357 FPS	346 FPS
high	304 FPS	287 FPS
ultra	252 FPS	241 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	346 FPS
medium	309 FPS	307 FPS
high	265 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	219 FPS	212 FPS
4K
low	217 FPS	224 FPS
medium	197 FPS	199 FPS
high	179 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	145 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Open Xeon Gold 6132

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Gold 6132
1080p
low	552 FPS	556 FPS
medium	539 FPS	556 FPS
high	501 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	442 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	556 FPS
medium	464 FPS	556 FPS
high	418 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	367 FPS	512 FPS
4K
low	420 FPS	461 FPS
medium	334 FPS	361 FPS
high	303 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	252 FPS	261 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Open Xeon Gold 6132

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Gold 6132
1080p
low	552 FPS	556 FPS
medium	552 FPS	556 FPS
high	552 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	556 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	556 FPS
medium	552 FPS	556 FPS
high	493 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	444 FPS	468 FPS
medium	408 FPS	421 FPS
high	367 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	327 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Open Xeon Gold 6132

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon Gold 6132

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6132

The Xeon Gold 6132 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 14 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 22,244 points. Launch price was $2,111.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6132 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon Gold 6132 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6132 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6132 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 scores 22,066 against the Xeon Gold 6132's 22,244 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6132. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6132.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper 1920	Xeon Gold 6132
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	14 / 28+17%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+23%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+66%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	14 MB+2700%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	22,066	22,244

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the SP3r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6132 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.