Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 140W, a 134W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,132).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2233.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 6W instead of 140W, a 134W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 22,132).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2233.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	269 FPS	175 FPS
medium	242 FPS	156 FPS
high	203 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	236 FPS	143 FPS
medium	193 FPS	121 FPS
high	157 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	164 FPS	65 FPS
medium	136 FPS	59 FPS
high	105 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	37 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	447 FPS	398 FPS
medium	371 FPS	357 FPS
high	326 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	252 FPS
1440p
low	388 FPS	339 FPS
medium	336 FPS	309 FPS
high	297 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	254 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	217 FPS
medium	247 FPS	197 FPS
high	231 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	194 FPS	145 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	553 FPS	552 FPS
medium	553 FPS	539 FPS
high	553 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	537 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	553 FPS	552 FPS
medium	553 FPS	464 FPS
high	517 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	445 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	502 FPS	420 FPS
medium	444 FPS	334 FPS
high	378 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	252 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	553 FPS	552 FPS
medium	553 FPS	552 FPS
high	553 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	553 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	553 FPS	552 FPS
medium	553 FPS	552 FPS
high	553 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	547 FPS	423 FPS
4K
low	553 FPS	444 FPS
medium	507 FPS	408 FPS
high	452 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	387 FPS	318 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS scores 22,132 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+32%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+34%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	6 MB+1100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,132	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.