PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 248.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,010 vs 22,066).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7400 moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 7400

2025

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 248.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,010 vs 22,066).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 7400 moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920 better than Ryzen 5 7400?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 7400 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7400 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is 248.9% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7400 is also 248.0% better value on MSRP (96.1 vs 27.6 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7400 Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7400	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	146 FPS	175 FPS
medium	121 FPS	156 FPS
high	105 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	132 FPS	143 FPS
medium	108 FPS	121 FPS
high	91 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	65 FPS
medium	63 FPS	59 FPS
high	51 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	37 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7400 Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7400	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	296 FPS	398 FPS
medium	256 FPS	357 FPS
high	229 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	200 FPS	252 FPS
1440p
low	260 FPS	339 FPS
medium	230 FPS	309 FPS
high	210 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	217 FPS
medium	183 FPS	197 FPS
high	169 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	145 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7400 Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7400	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	550 FPS	539 FPS
high	550 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	550 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	550 FPS	464 FPS
high	531 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	481 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	419 FPS	420 FPS
medium	349 FPS	334 FPS
high	297 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	252 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7400 Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7400	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	550 FPS	552 FPS
high	550 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	550 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	550 FPS	552 FPS
medium	550 FPS	552 FPS
high	550 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	423 FPS
4K
low	550 FPS	444 FPS
medium	510 FPS	408 FPS
high	445 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	379 FPS	318 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7400 Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7400 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen 5 7400

The Ryzen 5 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,010 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7400 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 12.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7400 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7400 scores 22,010 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7400	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+13%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,010	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7400 uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7400	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Socket	AM5	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7400 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($229 vs $799), the Ryzen 5 7400 is $570 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7400 delivers 96.1 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Ryzen 5 7400 the 110.7% better value option.