
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 101.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 30.7 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,829 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.7 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 165 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 421 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 16,829 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen Threadripper 1900X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X's 16,829 — a 48.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,712+65% | 16,829 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($449 vs $549), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 30.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 67.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-18% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+101% | 30.7 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












