Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +56.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $326 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 305.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen Embedded V3C18I.

Trade-offs

  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

2022

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (13,856 vs 19,532).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.7 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($500 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Ryzen Embedded V3C18I?
Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 56.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 41% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 56.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the better fit. You are getting 41% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-12400F is the smarter buy today. Core i5-12400F is $326 cheaper on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and it gives you a 56.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 305.1% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 27.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
1080p
low183 FPS172 FPS
medium168 FPS138 FPS
high139 FPS112 FPS
ultra119 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS142 FPS
medium132 FPS112 FPS
high106 FPS90 FPS
ultra89 FPS71 FPS
4K
low87 FPS66 FPS
medium81 FPS55 FPS
high64 FPS44 FPS
ultra49 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
1080p
low471 FPS173 FPS
medium397 FPS151 FPS
high341 FPS132 FPS
ultra301 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS149 FPS
medium351 FPS134 FPS
high309 FPS119 FPS
ultra265 FPS98 FPS
4K
low282 FPS108 FPS
medium248 FPS100 FPS
high229 FPS92 FPS
ultra196 FPS74 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
1080p
low488 FPS346 FPS
medium488 FPS346 FPS
high488 FPS346 FPS
ultra488 FPS346 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS346 FPS
medium488 FPS346 FPS
high485 FPS346 FPS
ultra434 FPS346 FPS
4K
low442 FPS346 FPS
medium389 FPS317 FPS
high337 FPS280 FPS
ultra274 FPS225 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
1080p
low488 FPS346 FPS
medium488 FPS346 FPS
high488 FPS346 FPS
ultra488 FPS346 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS346 FPS
medium488 FPS346 FPS
high488 FPS346 FPS
ultra473 FPS346 FPS
4K
low488 FPS346 FPS
medium450 FPS346 FPS
high391 FPS346 FPS
ultra330 FPS326 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,856 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I's 13,856 — a 34% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+16%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+32%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
6 nm-14%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Rembrandt (2022)
PassMark
19,532+41%
13,856
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C18I). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I debuted at $500. On MSRP ($174 vs $500), the Core i5-12400F is $326 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 27.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I — making the Core i5-12400F the 120.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP
$174-65%
$500
Performance per Dollar
112.3+305%
27.7
Release Date
2022
2022