
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1650, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1650 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-1650
2012Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,056 vs 8,107).
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Xeon E5-1650
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1650, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1650 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,056 vs 8,107).
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V1756B better than Xeon E5-1650?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 201 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Xeon E5-1650


Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1650
Xeon E5-1650
The Xeon E5-1650 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,056 points. Launch price was $175.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1650 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-1650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1650 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1650 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1650 uses Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B scores 8,107 against the Xeon E5-1650's 8,056 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B vs 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1650.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz+2% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 12288 kB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 8,107 | 8,056 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1650 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1756B) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-1650). Primary use case: Xeon E5-1650 targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Xeon E5-1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












