
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 26.9 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1807B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,069 vs 8,107).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.9 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
2018Ryzen Embedded V1807B
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 26.9 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1807B across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,069 vs 8,107).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 26.9 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded V1756B better than Ryzen Embedded V1807B?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 67 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Ryzen Embedded V1807B


Ryzen Embedded V1756B
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,107 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
The Ryzen Embedded V1807B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,069 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Embedded V1756B and Ryzen Embedded V1807B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1756B versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1807B (base: 3.25 GHz vs 3.35 GHz). Both are built on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded V1756B scores 8,107 against the Ryzen Embedded V1807B's 8,069 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1756B. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.35 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 8,107 | 8,069 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP5 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Embedded V1756B launched at $250 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1807B debuted at $300. On MSRP ($250 vs $300), the Ryzen Embedded V1756B is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Embedded V1756B delivers 32.4 pts/$ vs 26.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1807B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1756B the 18.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Embedded V1756B | Ryzen Embedded V1807B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.4+20% | 26.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












