
Ryzen AI Max 390
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen AI Max 390
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,834 vs 43,174).
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $600 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen AI Max 390
2025Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,834 vs 43,174).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $600 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Ryzen AI Max 390?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 671 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 769 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 395 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1046 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 953 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 833 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 751 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 838 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 552 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max 390 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390


Ryzen AI Max 390
Ryzen AI Max 390
The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen AI Max 390 and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). Both are built on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture using a 4 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 41,834 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 3.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 41,834 | 43,174+3% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP11 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 8000 memory speed. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8000 | 8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 390) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 8050S | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen AI Max 390 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($0 vs $600), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $600 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max 390 | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












