PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 43,174).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Ryzen 5 7600X

2022

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 31.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 105W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,325 vs 43,174).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌90.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 55W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 94.7 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Ryzen 5 7600X?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 12.6% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data, 52.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 12.6% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better fit. You are getting 52.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 7600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is 100.7% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 7600X is also 31.7% better value on MSRP (94.7 vs 72.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 7600X Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	266 FPS	286 FPS
medium	246 FPS	253 FPS
high	210 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	185 FPS
1440p
low	226 FPS	266 FPS
medium	189 FPS	211 FPS
high	154 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	157 FPS	184 FPS
medium	131 FPS	147 FPS
high	101 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	97 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	649 FPS	778 FPS
medium	524 FPS	656 FPS
high	436 FPS	517 FPS
ultra	386 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	544 FPS	654 FPS
medium	455 FPS	572 FPS
high	388 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	341 FPS	368 FPS
medium	290 FPS	326 FPS
high	271 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	264 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	708 FPS	1021 FPS
medium	652 FPS	783 FPS
high	571 FPS	685 FPS
ultra	484 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	818 FPS
medium	554 FPS	635 FPS
high	479 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	409 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	463 FPS	565 FPS
medium	392 FPS	460 FPS
high	341 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	281 FPS	342 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	708 FPS	1079 FPS
medium	708 FPS	1015 FPS
high	708 FPS	912 FPS
ultra	708 FPS	811 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	895 FPS
medium	708 FPS	788 FPS
high	658 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	560 FPS	658 FPS
medium	502 FPS	582 FPS
high	452 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	391 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 7600X Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 5 7600X

The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 41.5% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+6%	5 GHz
Base Clock	4.7 GHz+47%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	6 MB+500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm	4 nm-20%
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	28,325	43,174+52%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,300	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,900	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,800	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Socket	AM5	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	8000+159900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+104857500%	128
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

Feature	Ryzen 5 7600X	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)	AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 5 7600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($299 vs $600), the Ryzen 5 7600X is $301 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 7600X delivers 94.7 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Ryzen 5 7600X the 27.3% better value option.