
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅+25.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-12700K
2021Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $191 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+25.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 43,174).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, matching the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 22.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+156% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 43,174+26% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 8000+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($409 vs $600), the Core i7-12700K is $191 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Core i7-12700K the 15.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-32% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+17% | 72.0 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












