PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900T

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 77.8 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 43,174).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Core i9-13900T

2023

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 77.8 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 43,174).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900T better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-13900T is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900T is the smarter buy today. Core i9-13900T is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 8.2% better value on MSRP (77.8 vs 72.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13900T Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	321 FPS	286 FPS
medium	311 FPS	253 FPS
high	247 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	185 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	266 FPS
medium	240 FPS	211 FPS
high	178 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	192 FPS	184 FPS
medium	164 FPS	147 FPS
high	123 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	97 FPS

Open Core i9-13900T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	401 FPS	778 FPS
medium	350 FPS	656 FPS
high	286 FPS	517 FPS
ultra	252 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	341 FPS	654 FPS
medium	306 FPS	572 FPS
high	255 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	207 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	368 FPS
medium	174 FPS	326 FPS
high	166 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	264 FPS

Open Core i9-13900T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	761 FPS	1021 FPS
medium	625 FPS	783 FPS
high	542 FPS	685 FPS
ultra	466 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	677 FPS	818 FPS
medium	565 FPS	635 FPS
high	483 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	495 FPS	565 FPS
medium	428 FPS	460 FPS
high	381 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	328 FPS	342 FPS

Open Core i9-13900T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1080p
low	1004 FPS	1079 FPS
medium	897 FPS	1015 FPS
high	785 FPS	912 FPS
ultra	698 FPS	811 FPS
1440p
low	833 FPS	895 FPS
medium	733 FPS	788 FPS
high	640 FPS	689 FPS
ultra	562 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	615 FPS	658 FPS
medium	550 FPS	582 FPS
high	487 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i9-13900T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900T and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Core i9-13900T

The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900T scores 42,735 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

Feature	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+6%	5 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+191%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	42,735	43,174+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900T versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 35.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900T) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900T) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).

Feature	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Socket	LGA1700	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600	8000+43%
Max RAM Capacity	192+50%	128
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13900T) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

Feature	Core i9-13900T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics	AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-13900T launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($549 vs $600), the Core i9-13900T is $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900T delivers 77.8 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Core i9-13900T the 7.9% better value option.