
Core i9-12900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900KS
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.0 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,174 vs 43,528).
Core i9-12900KS
2022Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 72.0 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,174 vs 43,528).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900KS better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 97 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 654 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 1021 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 748 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 635 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 342 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 973 FPS | 1079 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 763 FPS | 912 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 788 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 689 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 605 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900KS and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Core i9-12900KS
Core i9-12900KS
The Core i9-12900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,528 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900KS packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-12900KS has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-12900KS versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900KS (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-12900KS uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900KS scores 43,528 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-12900KS. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900KS vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+6% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 43,528 | 43,174 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 27,796 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,082 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i9-12900KS versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-12900KS) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900KS) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900KS) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 8000+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900KS) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 770 (Core i9-12900KS) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | AMD Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-12900KS launched at $739 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 debuted at $600. On MSRP ($739 vs $600), the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900KS delivers 58.9 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 — making the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 the 20% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $739 | $600-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.9 | 72.0+22% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












