PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-14700T

2024

Why buy it

✅+30.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $384 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,136 vs 18,390).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.

Core i7-14700T

2024

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅+30.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $384 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,136 vs 18,390).
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-14700T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-14700T better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is ahead with a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700T pulls ahead with 30.1% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700T is the better fit. You are getting 30.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-14700T is the smarter buy today. Core i7-14700T is at an unclear MSRP at $384 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 30.1% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (82.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-14700T Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	315 FPS	277 FPS
medium	306 FPS	243 FPS
high	243 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	233 FPS
medium	235 FPS	185 FPS
high	175 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	162 FPS
medium	160 FPS	129 FPS
high	119 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	345 FPS	684 FPS
medium	294 FPS	565 FPS
high	247 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	300 FPS	591 FPS
medium	265 FPS	514 FPS
high	224 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	360 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	352 FPS
medium	160 FPS	311 FPS
high	152 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	251 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	646 FPS	788 FPS
medium	528 FPS	788 FPS
high	465 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	594 FPS
1440p
low	588 FPS	788 FPS
medium	488 FPS	644 FPS
high	424 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	472 FPS
4K
low	431 FPS	562 FPS
medium	371 FPS	459 FPS
high	336 FPS	408 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	790 FPS	788 FPS
medium	790 FPS	788 FPS
high	717 FPS	788 FPS
ultra	644 FPS	781 FPS
1440p
low	772 FPS	788 FPS
medium	688 FPS	768 FPS
high	592 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	522 FPS	590 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	609 FPS
medium	494 FPS	541 FPS
high	440 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	426 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14700T and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Core i7-14700T

The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700T packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-14700T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700T scores 31,604 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-14700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,723 vs 2,886, a 5.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,390 vs 14,136 (26.2% advantage for the Core i7-14700T). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+150%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+4%	5 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+177%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)+3%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	31,604	31,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,723	2,886+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,390+30%	14,136

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-14700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700T) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket	LGA1700	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 770 (Core i7-14700T) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700T targets Productivity, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD 770	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Productivity	Enterprise AI Mobile