
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,132).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 28W, a 22W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,051 vs 22,132).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 445 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 502 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| high | 553 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 547 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 387 FPS | 388 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360


Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,051 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS scores 22,132 against the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360's 22,051 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+115% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,132 | 22,051 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses the FP7/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS | Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











