Ryzen AI 5 330 vs Xeon E5-2650L v4

AMD

Ryzen AI 5 330

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650L v4

14 Cores28 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen AI 5 330

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 35 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2650L v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +775% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (12,734 vs 12,794).
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
  • Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI 5 330 better than Xeon E5-2650L v4?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2650L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen AI 5 330 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI 5 330 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI 5 330 is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen AI 5 330 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen AI 5 330 is at an unclear MSRP at $350 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 5 330 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 14/28. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen AI 5 330Xeon E5-2650L v4
1080p
low169 FPS175 FPS
medium136 FPS151 FPS
high110 FPS118 FPS
ultra88 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS147 FPS
medium113 FPS123 FPS
high91 FPS93 FPS
ultra74 FPS76 FPS
4K
low79 FPS68 FPS
medium67 FPS61 FPS
high53 FPS47 FPS
ultra42 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen AI 5 330Xeon E5-2650L v4
1080p
low168 FPS210 FPS
medium142 FPS191 FPS
high128 FPS162 FPS
ultra111 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low142 FPS180 FPS
medium122 FPS164 FPS
high114 FPS142 FPS
ultra97 FPS110 FPS
4K
low101 FPS114 FPS
medium90 FPS105 FPS
high77 FPS92 FPS
ultra65 FPS73 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen AI 5 330Xeon E5-2650L v4
1080p
low320 FPS318 FPS
medium320 FPS318 FPS
high320 FPS318 FPS
ultra320 FPS318 FPS
1440p
low320 FPS318 FPS
medium320 FPS318 FPS
high320 FPS318 FPS
ultra320 FPS318 FPS
4K
low320 FPS318 FPS
medium320 FPS318 FPS
high286 FPS318 FPS
ultra226 FPS288 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen AI 5 330Xeon E5-2650L v4
1080p
low320 FPS318 FPS
medium320 FPS318 FPS
high320 FPS318 FPS
ultra320 FPS318 FPS
1440p
low320 FPS318 FPS
medium320 FPS318 FPS
high320 FPS318 FPS
ultra320 FPS318 FPS
4K
low320 FPS318 FPS
medium320 FPS318 FPS
high320 FPS318 FPS
ultra320 FPS318 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 5 330 and Xeon E5-2650L v4

AMD

Ryzen AI 5 330

The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650L v4

The Xeon E5-2650L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 12,734 points. Launch price was $1,329.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI 5 330 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v4 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 330 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 12,794 against the Xeon E5-2650L v4's 12,734 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 330. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330 vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2650L v4.

FeatureRyzen AI 5 330Xeon E5-2650L v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+80%
2.5 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz+18%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
35 MB+775%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3.5 MB+250%
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Krackan Point 2 (2025)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
12,794
12,734
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen AI 5 330Xeon E5-2650L v4
Socket
FP8
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%