
Ryzen AI 5 330
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2650L v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2650L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+775% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,734 vs 12,794).
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 5 330
2025Xeon E5-2650L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+775% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 35 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650L v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,734 vs 12,794).
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 5 330 better than Xeon E5-2650L v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2650L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2650L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2650L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2650L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 5 330 and Xeon E5-2650L v4


Ryzen AI 5 330
Ryzen AI 5 330
The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2650L v4
Xeon E5-2650L v4
The Xeon E5-2650L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 12,734 points. Launch price was $1,329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 5 330 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 versus 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v4 — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 330 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 12,794 against the Xeon E5-2650L v4's 12,734 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 330. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330 vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2650L v4.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2650L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 14 / 28+250% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+80% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+18% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 35 MB+775% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3.5 MB+250% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Krackan Point 2 (2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 12,794 | 12,734 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650L v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 5 330 | Xeon E5-2650L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











