PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-10700T

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen AI 5 330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
1.4% HIGHER MSRP
$355 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI 5 330

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $355 MSRP).
✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,794 vs 12,891).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-10700T

2020

Ryzen AI 5 330

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen AI 5 330 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $355 MSRP).
✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌
1.4% HIGHER MSRP
$355 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 330 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,794 vs 12,891).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10700T better than Ryzen AI 5 330?

Yes. Core i7-10700T is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10700T is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10700T is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10700T is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core i7-10700T is 1.4% more expensive on MSRP at $355 MSRP versus $350 MSRP, and it gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen AI 5 330 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 17.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI 5 330 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-10700T Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI 5 330 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
1080p
low	182 FPS	169 FPS
medium	148 FPS	136 FPS
high	119 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	142 FPS
medium	118 FPS	113 FPS
high	96 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	83 FPS	79 FPS
medium	72 FPS	67 FPS
high	57 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	42 FPS

Open Core i7-10700T Open Ryzen AI 5 330

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
1080p
low	217 FPS	168 FPS
medium	180 FPS	142 FPS
high	161 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	191 FPS	142 FPS
medium	163 FPS	122 FPS
high	146 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	97 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	101 FPS
medium	116 FPS	90 FPS
high	111 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	65 FPS

Open Core i7-10700T Open Ryzen AI 5 330

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
1080p
low	322 FPS	320 FPS
medium	322 FPS	320 FPS
high	322 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	320 FPS
1440p
low	322 FPS	320 FPS
medium	322 FPS	320 FPS
high	322 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	320 FPS
4K
low	322 FPS	320 FPS
medium	322 FPS	320 FPS
high	322 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	263 FPS	226 FPS

Open Core i7-10700T Open Ryzen AI 5 330

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
1080p
low	322 FPS	320 FPS
medium	322 FPS	320 FPS
high	322 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	320 FPS
1440p
low	322 FPS	320 FPS
medium	322 FPS	320 FPS
high	322 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	320 FPS
4K
low	322 FPS	320 FPS
medium	322 FPS	320 FPS
high	322 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	320 FPS

Open Core i7-10700T Open Ryzen AI 5 330

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10700T and Ryzen AI 5 330

Core i7-10700T

The Core i7-10700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 12,891 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen AI 5 330

The Ryzen AI 5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 12,794 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10700T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-10700T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10700T versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 330 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI 5 330 is built on the Krackan Point 2 (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-10700T scores 12,891 against the Ryzen AI 5 330's 12,794 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-10700T. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i7-10700T vs 4 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 330.

Feature	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB Intel® Smart Cache+300%	4 MB
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	—	Krackan Point 2 (2025)
PassMark	12,891	12,794
Geekbench 6 Single	1,531	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,814	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10700T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
Socket	LGA1200	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700T) / not specified (Ryzen AI 5 330). The Core i7-10700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen AI 5 330 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-10700T	Ryzen AI 5 330
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-10700T launched at $355 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 debuted at $350. On MSRP ($355 vs $350), the Ryzen AI 5 330 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700T delivers 36.3 pts/$ vs 36.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI 5 330 — making the Ryzen AI 5 330 the 0.7% better value option.