
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 31.8% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655+38% | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












