
Ryzen 7 7735HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 14,670).
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,500 vs 14,670).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS better than Ryzen 7 7735HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS


Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS
The Ryzen 7 7735HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,897 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735HS uses the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735HS scores 22,897 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 14,670 (8.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 1,903, a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,800 vs 10,609 (18.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 4.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,897 | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | 14,670+9% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,800 | 10,609+21% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP7 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 7735HS) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735HS) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735HS) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735HS targets High Performance Laptop, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | High Performance Laptop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











