
Ryzen 7 6800H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 6800H
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,957 vs 14,670).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 6800H
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,957 vs 14,670).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS better than Ryzen 7 6800H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 6800H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS


Ryzen 7 6800H
Ryzen 7 6800H
The Ryzen 7 6800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,932 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 6800H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 6800H uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 6800H scores 22,932 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 6800H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,957 vs 14,670 (12.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,845 vs 1,903, a 3.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,861 vs 10,609 (18% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,932 | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,957 | 14,670+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,845 | 1,903+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,861 | 10,609+20% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP7 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 6800H) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 6800H) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 6800H) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 6800H targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 6800H rivals Core i7-12700H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 6800H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












