
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 49.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 37,655+65% | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












