
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 45.2% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 37,655+58% | 23,781 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












