
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,781).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+21.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
Why buy it
- ✅+21.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,781).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 19.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 23,781+22% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











