
Ryzen 9 9955HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (55,025 vs 55,711).
Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (55,025 vs 55,711).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX better than Ryzen AI Max+ 395?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 577 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 375 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 562 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 848 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 515 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 678 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 482 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 300 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1071 FPS | 1050 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 947 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 827 FPS |
| ultra | 759 FPS | 745 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 651 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 564 FPS | 562 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 618 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9955HX and Ryzen AI Max+ 395


Ryzen 9 9955HX
Ryzen 9 9955HX
The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,711 points. Launch price was $650.


Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 9955HX and Ryzen AI Max+ 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9955HX uses the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 55,711 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 55,711+1% | 55,025 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,010 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,219 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,563 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9955HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 96 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 8000+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB+78643100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 9955HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX) and AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9955HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9955HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












