
Ryzen 9 9850HX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6418H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9850HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 185W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon Gold 6418H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,665 vs 51,711).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6418H, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6418H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9850HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌236.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9850HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9850HX
2025Xeon Gold 6418H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 185W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon Gold 6418H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅185.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,665 vs 51,711).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6418H, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9850HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌236.4% higher power demand at 185W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9850HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9850HX better than Xeon Gold 6418H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 669 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 564 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 849 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 987 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 929 FPS |
| ultra | 514 FPS | 843 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 678 FPS | 861 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 710 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 638 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1072 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 966 FPS | 839 FPS |
| high | 843 FPS | 723 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 627 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 842 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 747 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 487 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9850HX and Xeon Gold 6418H


Ryzen 9 9850HX
Ryzen 9 9850HX
The Ryzen 9 9850HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,665 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6418H
Xeon Gold 6418H
The Xeon Gold 6418H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,711 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9850HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6418H offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6418H has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9850HX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6418H — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9850HX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9850HX scores 51,665 against the Xeon Gold 6418H's 51,711 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6418H. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9850HX vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6418H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+30% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+43% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+7% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 51,665 | 51,711 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9850HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6418H uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9850HX versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6418H — the Ryzen 9 9850HX supports 7.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6418H supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 9850HX) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6418H). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 9850HX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6418H) — the Xeon Gold 6418H offers 52 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 9850HX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6418H).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+8% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9850HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9850HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6418H). The Ryzen 9 9850HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Xeon Gold 6418H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9850HX rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX; Xeon Gold 6418H rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9850HX | Xeon Gold 6418H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












