
Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (40,165 vs 62,323).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (40,165 vs 62,323).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core Ultra 5 245?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 613 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1004 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 956 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 834 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 758 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 764 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 43.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 40,165 | 62,323+55% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+127900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 128 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 245 launched at $319 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($319 vs $699), the Core Ultra 5 245 is $380 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 34.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $319-54% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+41% | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












