
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+29.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,151 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+29.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,151 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 9 7940H

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 3.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 25.5% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 37,655+29% | 29,151 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,646 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,495 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












