
EPYC 7413
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7413
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.7 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +51.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,226 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 202.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.8 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,213 vs 50,641).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7413, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7413
2021Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +51.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,226 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 202.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 83.8 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,825 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.7 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($1,825 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,213 vs 50,641).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7413, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7900X3D better than EPYC 7413?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 101 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 1164 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 1101 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 972 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 878 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 805 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 393 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 1255 FPS |
| medium | 821 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 707 FPS | 993 FPS |
| ultra | 623 FPS | 865 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 1037 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 899 FPS |
| high | 537 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 761 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 664 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 578 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7413 and Ryzen 9 7900X3D

EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413
The EPYC 7413 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,641 points. Launch price was $1,825.


Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,213 points. Launch price was $599.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7413 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7413 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7413 versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D (base: 2.65 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 7413 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7413 scores 50,641 against the Ryzen 9 7900X3D's 50,213 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7413. Both processors carry 128 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 5.6 GHz+56% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 4.4 GHz+66% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,641 | 50,213 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7413 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7413 versus 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — the Ryzen 9 7900X3D supports 47.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7413 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7413) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7413) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) — the EPYC 7413 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7413) and AM5 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5200+63% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7900X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7413) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7900X3D). The Ryzen 9 7900X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7413 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7413 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Ryzen 9 7900X3D rivals Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7413 launched at $1825 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D debuted at $599. On MSRP ($1825 vs $599), the Ryzen 9 7900X3D is $1226 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7413 delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 83.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7900X3D the 100.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7413 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1825 | $599-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.7 | 83.8+203% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












